ΕΛΕΝΗ ΓΕΙΑ ΣΟΥ !!!! ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΠΡΟΣΩΠΙΚΗ ΣΟΥ ΕΝΗΜΕΡΩΣΗ ΣΟΥ ΣΤΕΛΝΩ ΤΟ ΑΚΟΛΟΥΘΟ ΑΡΘΡΟ. ΕΓΩ ΔΕΝ ΘΑ ΤΟ ΚΟΙΝΟΠΟΙΗΣΩ (ΠΑΡΑ ΤΟΥ ΟΤΙ ΘΑ ΚΥΚΛΟΦΟΡΗΣΕΙ) ΓΙΑ ΝΑ ΜΗΝ ΚΑΘΗΣΥΧΑΣΤΟΥΝ ΟΙ ΕΛΛΗΝΕΣ !!! ΤΑ ΛΕΜΕ ΕΛΕΝΗ ΜΟΥ !!! ΓΡΗΓΟΡΗΣ
Οι κόμπροι στο στομάχι μου χαλάρωσαν λίγο .. Καταλαβαίνω γιατί δεν το δημοσίευσες ..
Οι Σλάβοι πρέπει να δουν τη συλλογική μας οργή και εμείς, ως Έθνος, θα πρέπει να δούμε όλους τους πολιτικτους προδότες,όπως ο Πάγκαλος και ο Τσίπρας, να βγαίνουν από το ντουλάπι τους. Θα το δημοσιεύσω μετά τις διαμαρτυρίες
Οι Σλάβοι πρέπει να έχουν συνειδητοποιήσει ότι ακόμη και η συμβολικη International Court Order δεν θα μπορεση να εμποδίση την Ελλάδα να εκδώσει άλλο Veto ειδικά επειδή, σύμφωνα με την απόφαση του Δικαστηρίου, παραβιάζουν επίσης απαγορευμένα θέματα όπως "provokation" και την "καλή εγγύηση" .
Δες τους παρακάτω συνδέσμους και περιεχόμενο. Έχω ερευνήσει τα θέματα κάπως
The ruling of the court in The Hague could have a moral value and make Macedonians feel like winners but actually it does not oblige third parties, like NATO or the EU, to give a green light to Macedonian membership application. A compromise and more flexibility between the two sides are needed in order to find a solution to the problem.
As pointed out in an editorial in the Dnevnik daily from December 6, the ruling is not "a ticket for immediate entry to NATO" and Macedonia needs to focus on the strategy - what after The Hague. Utrinski Vesnik daily added: "The ruling, that has a big legal and moral weight, should not be used to gain political points at domestic level and straining further the relations with Greece".
A similar view was shared by EP Rapporteur on Macedonia Richard Howitt, who told Deutsche Welle that the ICJ's ruling should give new impetus to the talks and lead eventually to a mutually acceptable solution. The European Commission said it would take note of the ruling but declined to comment. Macedonia is still hoping to get a green-light for opening of its EU accession talks at the EU summit on December 8 and 9 and not just another confirmation of the recommendation.
- AND
The European Commission did not miss to note that the name dispute was affecting the relations between the two neighbours and recalled Skopje's decision to erect a monument resembling Alexander the Great, which was slammed as provocation by Athens. "Actions and statements, which could adversely affect good neighbourly relations should be avoided," the Commission recommended.
Macedonia was granted a recommendation to start membership talks in 2009 but the name dispute is still impending over its European and Euro-Atlantic ambitions. One should not forget that the decisions at the EU leaders' summit require consensus and that good neighbourly relations are among the criteria which fulfilling could bring positive outcome for Macedonia.
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) on Monday (5 December) said Greece broke international law in vetoing Macedonia's entry to Nato due to a bilateral name dispute.
"Greece, by objecting to the admission of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to Nato, has breached its obligation [under an interim accord signed in September 1995]," the Hague-based court said in a press release. The 1995 agreement stipulates that Athens is not allowed to use the name dispute to block Macedonia's accession to international organisations.
Ever since Macedonia declared its independence in the aftermath of Yugoslavia's breakup in 1991, Greece has refused to recognise the name "Republic of Macedonia" claiming that it refers to one of its own provinces and is linked to its heritage. Macedonia was accepted into the United Nations in 1993 under the provisional name Former Yugoslav republic of Macedonia (Fyrom), pending the resolution of the dispute.
Skopje has also crossed red lines in the 1995 agreement under which it should refrain from "provocations" - its government named a highway and an airport "Alexander the Great" after the ancient king whom Macedonians claim to be their ancestor.
AND -
For its part, the Greek foreign ministry on Monday said the ICJ verdict "does not address the issue of the difference of the name of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, confirming that this difference should be resolved ... through negotiations under the auspices of the UN."
It blamed Skopje, noting "this indirectly calls on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to demonstrate a spirit of compromise so that negotiations may lead to a mutually acceptable solution."
Prime Minister George Papademos warned in a statement that "continuing provocations do not contribute to the consolidation of good neighbourly relations and mutual confidence ... Our country is ready to continue the negotiations in order to solve the name issue."
Nato secretary general Anders Fogh Rasmussen on Monday repeated that Macedonia will be invited to join "as soon as a mutually acceptable solution to the name issue has been reached."
"The International court ruling is more of a symbolic nature, as it cannot impose fines on Greece or force it to refrain from similar moves. However, it does highlight that Athens' veto on launching accession negotiations with Skopje is even more unjustified.
Macedonia still finds itself unable to start talks with the EU, despite the fact that it received the status of candidate country as early as December 2005. Croatia, another former Yugoslav republic, obtained candidate status in 2004, opened negotiations in 2005 and will sign an accession treaty on Friday."...."the Greek foreign Ministry stated that the judgement did not relate, and could not relate, to the decision making process of NATO.
..."Most specifically, with regard to NATO, we recall that its decisions, including those taken at the Summit in Bucharest (2008), Strasbourg (2009) and Lisbon (2010), were taken unanimously, reflecting its members shared conviction that the name issue of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia be resolved before it is invited to join the Alliance," Athens insists."
"The judgment is final, without appeal and is binding on the parties, though the World Court has no tools to enforce its decisions".."However, the court did not uphold Macedonia’s request and order Greece to restrain from blocking its smaller neighbour from joining International organizations in future."
"Nato secretary general Anders Fogh Rasmussen on Monday repeated that Macedonia will be invited to join "as soon as a mutually acceptable solution to the name issue has been reached."
A GOOD LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE COURT'S DECISION EVEN THOUGH A BIT WRONG ON HISTORICAL ISSUES. COPY THE LINK INTO CHROME IN ORDER TO HAVE IT TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH BECAUSE IT IS WRITTEN IN BRAZILIAN
IT STATES, IN PART
Due to the continuity of the dispute, the parties chose to conclude an Interim Agreement that provided for the establishment of diplomatic relations between them, taking care of other important matters in the same way. Appointment or judgment the devices object of divergent interpretations, among which the art. 5, in which the parties:
" Agree to continue negotiations under the auspices of the Secretary-General of the United Nations pursuant to Security Council Resolution 845 (1993) with a view to concluding an agreement on the difference described in that resolution and in Resolution 917 (1993) of the Security Council . "
Also, take care of art. 11 (1) of the said Agreement:
" Upon entry into force of the Interim Agreement, [Greece] agrees not to object to the application or accession by [Macedonia] front of international organizations and institutions, multilateral and regional organizations to which [Greece] is membra; however, [Greece] reserves the right to object to any accessions referred to above if and to the extent that [Macedonia] is referred to in such organization or institution differently than in paragraph 2 of resolution 817 (1993) of the Security Council " .
For the purposes of this post , it is worth mentioning, from now on, the writing of art. 21, paragraph 2, of the Agreement:
" Any differences or disputes that may occur between the parties concerning the interpretation or implementation of this Interim Agreement may be submitted by any of them to the International Court of Justice, except for the exception referred to in art. 5º, §1º ".
In the interval after the conclusion of the Interim Agreement, Macedonia joined several international organizations of which Greece was already a member. In relation to NATO, Macedonia had been accepted into the Partnership for Peace in 1995, and in 1999 in the Membership Action Plan , both of which belong to the same organization. However, at the Bucharest meeting held in 2008, in which the application for accession to the Organization was considered, it was denied, on the grounds that its implementation could not take place unless a mutually acceptable solution to the name was achieved. ......... " The parties agree to continue negotiations under the auspices of the Secretary-General of the United Nations pursuant to Security Council Resolution 845 (1993) with a view to concluding an agreement on the difference described in that Resolution and Resolution 817 (1993 ) of the Security Council ".
============================== ALSO SEE
https://www.ejiltalk.org/legality-of-veto-to-nato-accession/ Legality of Veto to NATO Accession: Comment on the ICJ’s Decision in the Dispute between fYR Macedonia and Greece Published on December 7, 2011 Antonios Tzanakopoulos, Associate Professor of Public International Law, University of Oxford & Secretary-General of the International Law Association.
foreignpolicy.com - The Name Game – Foreign Policy The Name Game The future of EU expansion? It all depends on what the meaning of the word "Macedonia" is. BY THOMAS MEANEY, HARRIS MYLONAS | AUGUST 12, 2009, 4:03 PM
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
ReplyDeleteΕΛΕΝΗ ΓΕΙΑ ΣΟΥ !!!!
ReplyDeleteΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΠΡΟΣΩΠΙΚΗ ΣΟΥ ΕΝΗΜΕΡΩΣΗ ΣΟΥ ΣΤΕΛΝΩ ΤΟ ΑΚΟΛΟΥΘΟ ΑΡΘΡΟ.
ΕΓΩ ΔΕΝ ΘΑ ΤΟ ΚΟΙΝΟΠΟΙΗΣΩ (ΠΑΡΑ ΤΟΥ ΟΤΙ ΘΑ ΚΥΚΛΟΦΟΡΗΣΕΙ) ΓΙΑ ΝΑ ΜΗΝ ΚΑΘΗΣΥΧΑΣΤΟΥΝ ΟΙ ΕΛΛΗΝΕΣ !!!
ΤΑ ΛΕΜΕ ΕΛΕΝΗ ΜΟΥ !!!
ΓΡΗΓΟΡΗΣ
kaini-ktisis.blogspot.com - Οι Σκοπιανοί κάνουν πίσω στο θέμα της ονομασίας (?)
ΓΡΗΓΟΡΗΣ TΣΟΥΛΟΣ Γρηγόρη.. ευχαριστώ πολύ
ReplyDeleteΟι κόμπροι στο στομάχι μου χαλάρωσαν λίγο .. Καταλαβαίνω γιατί δεν το δημοσίευσες ..
Οι Σλάβοι πρέπει να δουν τη συλλογική μας οργή και εμείς, ως Έθνος, θα πρέπει να δούμε όλους τους πολιτικτους προδότες,όπως ο Πάγκαλος και ο Τσίπρας, να βγαίνουν από το ντουλάπι τους. Θα το δημοσιεύσω μετά τις διαμαρτυρίες
Οι Σλάβοι πρέπει να έχουν συνειδητοποιήσει ότι ακόμη και η συμβολικη International Court Order δεν θα μπορεση να εμποδίση την Ελλάδα να εκδώσει άλλο Veto ειδικά επειδή, σύμφωνα με την απόφαση του Δικαστηρίου, παραβιάζουν επίσης απαγορευμένα θέματα όπως "provokation" και την "καλή εγγύηση" .
Δες τους παρακάτω συνδέσμους και περιεχόμενο.
Έχω ερευνήσει τα θέματα κάπως
Η γνώμη σου είναι ευπρόσδεκτη
Ελένη
==============
http://www.euinside.eu/en/news/macedonia-has-won-a-battle-but-not-the-war-in-the-name-issue-with-greece
The ruling of the court in The Hague could have a moral value and make Macedonians feel like winners but actually it does not oblige third parties, like NATO or the EU, to give a green light to Macedonian membership application. A compromise and more flexibility between the two sides are needed in order to find a solution to the problem.
As pointed out in an editorial in the Dnevnik daily from December 6, the ruling is not "a ticket for immediate entry to NATO" and Macedonia needs to focus on the strategy - what after The Hague. Utrinski Vesnik daily added: "The ruling, that has a big legal and moral weight, should not be used to gain political points at domestic level and straining further the relations with Greece".
A similar view was shared by EP Rapporteur on Macedonia Richard Howitt, who told Deutsche Welle that the ICJ's ruling should give new impetus to the talks and lead eventually to a mutually acceptable solution. The European Commission said it would take note of the ruling but declined to comment. Macedonia is still hoping to get a green-light for opening of its EU accession talks at the EU summit on December 8 and 9 and not just another confirmation of the recommendation.
- AND
The European Commission did not miss to note that the name dispute was affecting the relations between the two neighbours and recalled Skopje's decision to erect a monument resembling Alexander the Great, which was slammed as provocation by Athens. "Actions and statements, which could adversely affect good neighbourly relations should be avoided," the Commission recommended.
Macedonia was granted a recommendation to start membership talks in 2009 but the name dispute is still impending over its European and Euro-Atlantic ambitions. One should not forget that the decisions at the EU leaders' summit require consensus and that good neighbourly relations are among the criteria which fulfilling could bring positive outcome for Macedonia.
==============================
https://euobserver.com/enlargement/114506
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) on Monday (5 December) said Greece broke international law in vetoing Macedonia's entry to Nato due to a bilateral name dispute.
"Greece, by objecting to the admission of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to Nato, has breached its obligation [under an interim accord signed in September 1995]," the Hague-based court said in a press release. The 1995 agreement stipulates that Athens is not allowed to use the name dispute to block Macedonia's accession to international organisations.
Ever since Macedonia declared its independence in the aftermath of Yugoslavia's breakup in 1991, Greece has refused to recognise the name "Republic of Macedonia" claiming that it refers to one of its own provinces and is linked to its heritage.
ReplyDeleteMacedonia was accepted into the United Nations in 1993 under the provisional name Former Yugoslav republic of Macedonia (Fyrom), pending the resolution of the dispute.
Skopje has also crossed red lines in the 1995 agreement under which it should refrain from "provocations" - its government named a highway and an airport "Alexander the Great" after the ancient king whom Macedonians claim to be their ancestor.
AND -
For its part, the Greek foreign ministry on Monday said the ICJ verdict "does not address the issue of the difference of the name of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, confirming that this difference should be resolved ... through negotiations under the auspices of the UN."
It blamed Skopje, noting "this indirectly calls on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to demonstrate a spirit of compromise so that negotiations may lead to a mutually acceptable solution."
Prime Minister George Papademos warned in a statement that "continuing provocations do not contribute to the consolidation of good neighbourly relations and mutual confidence ... Our country is ready to continue the negotiations in order to solve the name issue."
Nato secretary general Anders Fogh Rasmussen on Monday repeated that Macedonia will be invited to join "as soon as a mutually acceptable solution to the name issue has been reached."
==============================
http://www.euractiv.com/section/enlargement/news/court-blames-greece-for-blocking-macedonia-s-nato-bid/
"The International court ruling is more of a symbolic nature, as it cannot impose fines on Greece or force it to refrain from similar moves. However, it does highlight that Athens' veto on launching accession negotiations with Skopje is even more unjustified.
Macedonia still finds itself unable to start talks with the EU, despite the fact that it received the status of candidate country as early as December 2005. Croatia, another former Yugoslav republic, obtained candidate status in 2004, opened negotiations in 2005 and will sign an accession treaty on Friday."...."the Greek foreign Ministry stated that the judgement did not relate, and could not relate, to the decision making process of NATO.
..."Most specifically, with regard to NATO, we recall that its decisions, including those taken at the Summit in Bucharest (2008), Strasbourg (2009) and Lisbon (2010), were taken unanimously, reflecting its members shared conviction that the name issue of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia be resolved before it is invited to join the Alliance," Athens insists."
==============================
http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/icj-judgment
"The judgment is final, without appeal and is binding on the parties, though the World Court has no tools to enforce its decisions".."However, the court did not uphold Macedonia’s request and order Greece to restrain from blocking its smaller neighbour from joining International organizations in future."
==============================
https://euobserver.com/enlargement/114506
"Nato secretary general Anders Fogh Rasmussen on Monday repeated that Macedonia will be invited to join "as soon as a mutually acceptable solution to the name issue has been reached."
ReplyDelete==============================
https://neiarcadas.wordpress.com/2011/12/14/interimaccor/
A GOOD LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE COURT'S DECISION EVEN THOUGH A BIT WRONG ON HISTORICAL ISSUES. COPY THE LINK INTO CHROME IN ORDER TO HAVE IT TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH BECAUSE IT IS WRITTEN IN BRAZILIAN
IT STATES, IN PART
Due to the continuity of the dispute, the parties chose to conclude an Interim Agreement that provided for the establishment of diplomatic relations between them, taking care of other important matters in the same way. Appointment or judgment the devices object of divergent interpretations, among which the art. 5, in which the parties:
" Agree to continue negotiations under the auspices of the Secretary-General of the United Nations pursuant to Security Council Resolution 845 (1993) with a view to concluding an agreement on the difference described in that resolution and in Resolution 917 (1993) of the Security Council . "
Also, take care of art. 11 (1) of the said Agreement:
" Upon entry into force of the Interim Agreement, [Greece] agrees not to object to the application or accession by [Macedonia] front of international organizations and institutions, multilateral and regional organizations to which [Greece] is membra; however, [Greece] reserves the right to object to any accessions referred to above if and to the extent that [Macedonia] is referred to in such organization or institution differently than in paragraph 2 of resolution 817 (1993) of the Security Council " .
For the purposes of this post , it is worth mentioning, from now on, the writing of art. 21, paragraph 2, of the Agreement:
" Any differences or disputes that may occur between the parties concerning the interpretation or implementation of this Interim Agreement may be submitted by any of them to the International Court of Justice, except for the exception referred to in art. 5º, §1º ".
In the interval after the conclusion of the Interim Agreement, Macedonia joined several international organizations of which Greece was already a member. In relation to NATO, Macedonia had been accepted into the Partnership for Peace in 1995, and in 1999 in the Membership Action Plan , both of which belong to the same organization. However, at the Bucharest meeting held in 2008, in which the application for accession to the Organization was considered, it was denied, on the grounds that its implementation could not take place unless a mutually acceptable solution to the name was achieved.
.........
" The parties agree to continue negotiations under the auspices of the Secretary-General of the United Nations pursuant to Security Council Resolution 845 (1993) with a view to concluding an agreement on the difference described in that Resolution and Resolution 817 (1993 ) of the Security Council ".
==============================
ALSO SEE
https://www.ejiltalk.org/legality-of-veto-to-nato-accession/
Legality of Veto to NATO Accession: Comment on the ICJ’s Decision in the Dispute between fYR Macedonia and Greece
Published on December 7, 2011
Antonios Tzanakopoulos, Associate Professor of Public International Law, University of Oxford & Secretary-General of the International Law Association.
==============================
foreignpolicy.com - The Name Game – Foreign Policy
ReplyDeleteThe Name Game
The future of EU expansion? It all depends on what the meaning of the word "Macedonia" is.
BY THOMAS MEANEY, HARRIS MYLONAS | AUGUST 12, 2009, 4:03 PM
ΓΡΗΓΟΡΗΣ TΣΟΥΛΟΣ GREGORI I JUST WANTED TO PUT A SMILE ON YOUR FACE
ReplyDeleteTHIS MEME MADE ME LAUGH MY ASS OFF
plus.google.com - Theodora Tsagkari - Google+
THIS VIDEO MADE ME FEEL EVEN BETTER
https://plus.google.com/+GovernmentGangStalkingandElectronicHarassment/posts/iqJKurHeNAX
CHEERS
ELENI